Details

<p>1. Chapter I:&nbsp;Paris in Parallel: Classical Biography in an Age of Revolution.- 2.&nbsp;Chapter II:&nbsp;&nbsp;Ancient Biographers and Modern Classicists: “What is Truth?”.- 3.&nbsp;Chapter III: &nbsp;&nbsp;Biography as Representation: Plutarch’s <i>Parallel Lives.-</i> 4.&nbsp;Chapter IV:&nbsp;Biography as Censure: Suetonius and Procopius.- 5.&nbsp;Chapter V:&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;Biography as Persuasion: The Christian Gospels.- 6.&nbsp;Chapter VI:&nbsp;&nbsp; Biography as Inner Drama: Athanasius’s <i>Life of Saint Antony.- 7.&nbsp;</i>Chapter VII:&nbsp; Heroic Biography: Carlyle & Co..- 7.&nbsp;Chapter VIII: Caustic Biography: Strachey & Co..- 8.&nbsp;Conclusion: “Beauty is Terror”.</p>

<p></p><p><b>Robert Fraser </b>is a biographer, critic and poet. <i>The Chameleon Poet </i>(2001)<i>,&nbsp;</i>his biography of&nbsp;George Barker, was&nbsp;<i>Spectator&nbsp;</i>Book of the Year in&nbsp;2002, and in May 2012 <i>Night Thoughts</i>, his life of David Gascoyne, topped the&nbsp;<i>Independent’s&nbsp;</i>list of&nbsp;Best Ten New Biographies. He has also published books on Marcel&nbsp;Proust (1994) and on the classicist and anthropologist Sir James Frazer (1990),&nbsp;whose magnum opus&nbsp;<i>The Golden Bough&nbsp;</i>he edited in 1994. He has held academic&nbsp;positions in Ghana, Leeds, London, and Trinity College Cambridge, UK. He is Emeritus&nbsp;Professor of Literature in the Open University, UK, and a Fellow of the Royal Society&nbsp;of Literature.</p><br><p></p>

<p></p><p>Marrying life-writing with classical reception, this book examines ancient biography and its impact on subsequent ages. Close readings of ancient texts are framed by an assessment of their influence on the age of the French Revolution and Napoleon, and on the nineteenth, twentieth, and twenty-first centuries, of responses to ancient biography of modern critics, and of its visible legacy in art and film. Crucially it asks what modern biographers can learn from their ancient predecessors. Are the challenges involved in life-writing still the same? Have working methods changed, and in what ways? What in the context of biographical writing is truth, and how are its interests best served? How is it possible, now as then, honestly to convey a life?</p><br><p></p>

Contends that modern biography has its roots in the classical world Posits a model of a quartet of biographical archetypes arising from biographers in the classical world Examines previously overlooked connections between biographers of the 18th century and onwards, and biographers of the classical world